[Film Review] Giant (1956)

Giant poster.jpg

Title: Giant
Year: 1956
Country: USA
Language: English, Spanish
Genre: Drama, Western
Director: George Stevens
Fred Guiol
Ivan Moffat
based on the novel by Edna Ferber
Music: Dimitri Tiomkin
Cinematography: William C. Mellor
Rock Hudson
Elizabeth Taylor
James Dean
Carroll Baker
Mercedes McCambridge
Dennis Hopper
Chill Wills
Fran Bennett
Elsa Cârdenas
Earl Holliman
Jane Withers
Rod Taylor
Paul Fix
Judith Evelyn
Sal Mineo
Carolyn Craig
Sheb Wooley
Alexander Scourby
Barbara Barrie
Mickey Simpson
Rating: 8.3/10

Giant 1956.jpg

George Steven’s epic western GIANT, based on Edna Ferber’s roman-fleuve about a wealthy Texas rancher household that spans over decades, rightfully won him a second Oscar for BEST DIRECTOR, but this is the sole trophy out of the picture’s 10 nominations (although Mercedes McCambridge’s coattail nomination is a fluke in hindsight, she has nothing to wield but a frosty front), mostly lost out to Michael Anderson’s less time-honored AROUND THE WORLD IN 80 DAYS (1956), another taint forever besmirches the Academy’s credibility.

The couple under the limelight is Jordan “Bick” Benedict Jr. (Hudson), the said rancher and his wife Leslie Lynnton (Taylor), a socialite from Maryland, who must adapt herself to the a completely different lifestyle but never flinches from her modern view of treating their Mexican employees (yes, they are referred as wetbacks) with equal respect, which collides with Bick’s more entrenched racist frame of mind, and this “progressive East Coast vs. traditional Western Inland” leitmotif maintains as the pillar of the film and later evolves into Bick’s epic defeat of his paternalistic arrangement in relation to their three children. Throughout, it is Bick’s glacial change of his old-world attitude that flourishes during all the long years, Rock Hudson gives an endearingly no-nonsense impersonation that not unlike his first name, becomes a bedrock of the film, a pretense-free Texan learns to brave a new world that beyond his widest imagination and eventually transmutes into a better person, a titular “giant” in the end, even he is beaten up for standing up for the right cause, why it is so inspiring because it is a personal victory, and means the world to them, good deeds must be carried out no matter how formidable adversity looks, who can refute that?

Taylor, on the other hand, dazzles in Leslie’s bluff honesty and impeccable integrity that makes us root for her right out of box, Leslie’s life orbit is less tectonic, but incredibly, both she and Hudson acquit themselves convincingly under their senior makeup, to parent fresh-faces like Dennis Hopper and Carrol Baker, and a strong sense of affinity between the two never get attenuated, not even during their not-so-infrequent spats.

Of course, the biggest selling point is James Dean in his final picture, although for sentimental reasons, he received his second posthumous Oscar nomination in the leading actor category, but his indecipherable upstart Jett Rink is a substantial supporting character in the whole picture, and he would be a shoo-in to win if he could have competed in the category where his character truly belongs, however, his name had already become too big a legend to be relegated at that point. His portrayal of Jett, emphatically registers a false layer of insouciance that defies operatics, vaguely masks his touching vulnerability and troubling uneasiness towards the unattainable object of his desire, Leslie, whose footprint inadvertently strikes gold for him, but whose heart he can never conquer.

Thus, it is the black gold that sounds the death knell of the Western genre as we know it, Stevens and DP. William C. Mellor employ stunning imagery to exhibit the burgeoning modernization that invades the vastness where materialistic gain lies beneath and beckons, as an answer to the prior un-warped long shots which retain the Old West in its most august splendor, the cattle herd sequences, or the majestic take on Benedicts’ singular mansion for instance, but at the end of the day, it is the story’s sagacious message that transcends its racist, patriarchy milieu, and makes GIANT a culturally, historically and aesthetically significant American tome that takes us through an elemental learning-curve of open-mindedness and righteousness that flouts the specious “winner takes it all” precept, without forging its tangy nostalgia for a bygone era.

referential entry: Stevens’ A PLACE IN THE SUN (1951, 8.1/10).

Oscar 1956 - Giant.jpg



One thought on “[Film Review] Giant (1956)

  1. Pingback: [Film Review] Shane (1953) – Cinema Omnivore

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s